Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Pate v. McClain

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided May 3, 1989No. 09-88-009-CVPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BROOKSHIRE, Justice.

Suit involving a partnership. Plaintiff, Kyle McClain, had been a partner with Gordon R. Pate and Joe Michael Dodson. The partnership law firm was styled “Pate, Dodson and McClain.” That partnership to practice law came into being on January 1, 1986. It ceased as an on-going partnership of attorneys on June 20, 1986. On that date, McClain voluntarily left the partnership.

McClain initially sued for his alleged full share of the partnership’s undistributed net earnings for the April-June 1986 quarter and also for a full accounting. Later he pleaded that during the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Truly v. AustinTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Jenkins v. Henry C. Beck CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Industrial Life Insurance Company v. FinleyTexas Supreme Court · 1964

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cleveland Regional Medical Center, L.P. v. Celtic Properties, L.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2010
  2. David McDavid Nissan, Inc. v. Subaru of America, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1999
  3. Langhoff v. MarrCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  4. Baeza v. Hector's Tire & Wrecker Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2015
  5. Baylor Health Care System v. Employers Reinsurance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API