Legal Opinion

United States v. Parvin

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 4, 2009No. 1071495Published

1Per curiam

This case is before us on certified questions from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama. Pursuant to federal law, the United States Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Alabama charged Jimmie David Parvin with indecent exposure on federal public land under § 13A-6-68, Ala.Code 1975, which states, in pertinent part:

“(a) A person commits the crime of indecent exposure if, with intent to arouse or gratify sexual desire of himself or of any person other than his spouse, he exposes his genitals under circumstances in which he knows his conduct is likely…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ernest Kay v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
  2. United States v. Richard Lee Fesler, Jr. And Deborah Ruth FeslerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  3. United States v. Paul W. PriceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
  4. United States v. FeslerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  5. United States v. BurnettDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API