United States v. Burnett
District Court, N.D. Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
CORRECTED 1 MEMORANDUM OPINION 2
U.W. CLEMON, District Judge.
In this appeal from his conviction on charges of indecent exposure and public lewdness on federal property, 3 Defendant Julian B. Burnett raises the issues of whether consent is an element of these crimes and whether the trial court abused its discretion in sentencing him. The Court concludes that while consent is not required for the crime of public lewdness, it is required for the crime of indecent exposure. The Court also concludes that the Magistrate Judge did not abuse his discretion in sentencing the Defendant.
Thus, the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Fletcher v. Tuscaloosa Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
- United States v. Richard Poirier, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Hawkins v. Jefferson CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gray v. Koch Foods, Inc.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2022
- United States v. ParvinSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009