Legal Opinion

State v. Shaw

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 11, 1869PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from Polk Pistriot Qov/rt. Action in chancery to foreclose a mortgage. Decree for plaintiff. Defendants E. J. Ingersoll, James Callanan, Jr., and James A. Williamson appeal. The facts of the case appear in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.

^oMtaícttve015 ‘ notlce' On the 27th day of June, 1856, the defendants Alexander Shaw and wife executed a mortgage to James D. Eads, as superintendent of pubhe instruction, to secure the sum of $3,000, money of the school fund of the State, borrowed by Shaw of said Eads as a public officer. The mortgage covers lots 9, 10, 11 and 12, in block 5, in the “Town of PeMoinef and also other lands. On the 24th day of January, 1859, Shaw and wife executed a trust deed to J. E. Hull, to secure a note of $391, executed by Shaw to defendant E. J. Ingersoll. The deed describes the property conveyed in the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wood v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  2. Harris v. FlyNew York Court of Chancery · 1839
  3. Johnston v. GwathmeyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1823
  4. Casey v. HarnedSupreme Court of Iowa · 1857
  5. Jasper County ex rel. School Fund v. RogersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Huston v. ScottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Bless v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  3. Diver v. Keokuk Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  4. Thomas v. DesneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
  5. Hahn v. Clayton CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1934

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API