Legal Opinion

State of Arizona v. Stanton

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1942No. Criminal No. 903PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

— This action is prosecuted by the state against John Stanton, as principal, and G. R. Gonzales, S. J. Márchese and Concepcion Márchese, as sureties, to recover the penalty of a bail bond forfeited by said Stanton. The bail bond was given August 13, 1940, before the preliminary examination, and undertook

“that the said John Stanton will appear and answer the charge above mentioned in whatever Court it may be prosecuted, and will at all times hold himself amenable to the orders and process of the Court, and, if convicted, will appear for judgment, and render himself in execution thereof, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. County of San Luis Obispo v. RyalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. State v. SorensenUtah Supreme Court · 1916
  3. People v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. State v. MerckArizona Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United Bonding Ins. Co. v. City Court of City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  2. State v. MitchellSuperior Court of Delaware · 1965
  3. State v. CleereCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  4. State v. Liberty Bail BondsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API