Legal Opinion

State v. Robinson

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 25, 1995No. 28004-0-IPublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBecker, J.

Defense counsel, aware that his former client could put herself at risk by testifying, chose not to call her as a witness. Because her testimony could have helped the defendant, the trial court erred in concluding that the conflict of interest did not adversely affect the attorney’s performance.

I

In early 1989, Seattle Police Detective Darryl Williams, working undercover, began buying methamphetamine from Steven Blair. Blair told Williams his suppliers were two women named "Bonnie and Mary Ann,” whom he frequently referred to as "the girls.”

On April 20, 1989, Detective Williams asked if Blair…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. BarraganCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  3. State v. BarraganCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  4. State v. HarellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
  5. State v. ReganCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API