Legal Opinion
Smith Unemployment Compensation Case
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided November 14, 1958No. Appeal, No. 167PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Rhodes, P. J.,
This is an appeal by claimant from a decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review denying her benefits on the ground that she was disqualified under section 402 (b) of the Unemployment Compensation.Law, 43 PS §802 (b).
Claimant was last employed on a belt line operation by the Hershey Chocolate Corporation, Hershey, Pennsylvania. On February 8, 1956, the employment relationship was terminated because of a company policy which forbids female employes from continuing at work beyond the fifth month of pregnancy. It was the conclusion of the board that this…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- J. I. Case Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States Steel Corporation v. Sim L. NicholsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
- National Labor Relations Board v. Nash-Finch Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954
- Amalgamated Ass'n of Street, Electric Railway & Motor Coach Employes of America v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Elliott Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cohen v. Temple University of the Commonwealth System of Higher EducationSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Cohen v. TEMPLE UNIVERSITY OF COM., ETC.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982