Legal Opinion

People v. Sneath & Arnold

California Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1865PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from the District Court, Sixth Judicial District, Sacramento County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Shafter, J.

This is an action to recover a tax on personal property levied by the City of Sacramento on the 23d day of June, 1863. The complaint alleges, amongst other things, that the property assessed was within the city limits at the date of the assessment; that it belonged to the firm of “ Sneath & Arnold,” and that it Avas valued at thirteen thousand two hundred and fifty dollars. The answer avers that the firm of Sneath & Arnold was dissolved on the 1st day of January, 1863, and that since that time it has neither owned nor possessed any personal property in Sacramento. The…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Moss v. ShearCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Kelsey v. AbbottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  3. People v. HolladayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. McCreeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Weinreich v. HensleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. City & County of San Francisco v. FloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  4. City & County of San Francisco v. PennieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Pearson v. CreedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API