William F. Klingensmith, Inc. v. District of Columbia Ex Rel. Reliance Insurance
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Appellants appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court awarding the Reliance Insurance Co. (Reliance) $9,413.92. They contend that the trial court erred in finding that appellant William F. Klingensmith, Inc. (Klingensmith) had by silence agreed to pay Reliance $8,492.10 in settlement of claims arising from a dispute concerning performance under a subcontract between Klingensmith and Cohen Brothers Plumbing & Heating, Inc. (Cohen). We are persuaded that Klingensmith’s silence could not as a matter of law constitute an acceptance of Reliance’s offer and we must accordingly reverse the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Freimuth v. Glens Falls InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1957
- Laredo Nat. Bank v. GordonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932
- Brooks Towers Corporation, and Cross-Appellees v. The Hunkin-Conkey Construction Company and Federal Insurance Company, and Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
- Lamis v. Des Moines Elevator & Grain Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1930
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re US Office Products Co. Securities Lit.District Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Steuart Investment Co. v. Meyer Group, Ltd.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Elwell v. ElwellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Capitol Hill Group v. Shaw Pittman LLP (In Re Capital Hill Group)District Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- In Re HaarDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.