Legal Opinion

William F. Klingensmith, Inc. v. District of Columbia Ex Rel. Reliance Insurance

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 1, 1977No. 9584PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellants appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court awarding the Reliance Insurance Co. (Reliance) $9,413.92. They contend that the trial court erred in finding that appellant William F. Klingensmith, Inc. (Klingensmith) had by silence agreed to pay Reliance $8,492.10 in settlement of claims arising from a dispute concerning performance under a subcontract between Klingensmith and Cohen Brothers Plumbing & Heating, Inc. (Cohen). We are persuaded that Klingensmith’s silence could not as a matter of law constitute an acceptance of Reliance’s offer and we must accordingly reverse the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Freimuth v. Glens Falls InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Laredo Nat. Bank v. GordonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932
  3. Brooks Towers Corporation, and Cross-Appellees v. The Hunkin-Conkey Construction Company and Federal Insurance Company, and Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
  4. Lamis v. Des Moines Elevator & Grain Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1930

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re US Office Products Co. Securities Lit.District Court, District of Columbia · 2003
  2. Steuart Investment Co. v. Meyer Group, Ltd.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Elwell v. ElwellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Capitol Hill Group v. Shaw Pittman LLP (In Re Capital Hill Group)District Court, District of Columbia · 2004
  5. In Re HaarDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API