Legal Opinion · Dissent

In the Interest of Unnamed Baby McLean

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 17, 1985No. 2-84-141-CVPublished

1DissentHill, Justice

I respectfully dissent, adopting the reasoning of the dissenting opinion in In Interest of T.E.T., 603 S.W.2d 793 (Tex.1980). I find the majority opinion in T.E.T. and the majority opinion in this case to be inconsistent with the constitutional principles expressed in the cases of Caban v. Mohammed, 441 U.S. 380, 99 S.Ct. 1760, 60 L.Ed.2d 297 (1979) and Lehr v. Robertson, 463 U.S. 248, 103 S.Ct. 2985, 77 L.Ed.2d 614 (1983).

In Caban, the Supreme Court declared unconstitutional sec. Ill of the New York State Domestic Relations Law (McKinney 1977), which permitted an unwed mother, but not an…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Craig v. BorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. F. S. Royster Guano Co. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  5. Lehr v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API