Legal Opinion

Luxfer Prism Patents Co. v. Elkins

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania

Decided January 18, 1900No. Nos. 5, 6PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Taxation of 'Costs.

1Opinion of the Court

McPHERSON, District Judge.

At the time the demurrers to these bills were argued, the plaintiff’s motions to dismiss as to one of the patents that were involved in each case were also heard. The demurrers were overruled, and the motions to dismiss were allowed upon condition that all the costs thus far accrued in each case should he paid. The defendants contend that they are entitled to the docket fee of §20 in each case, and also to the cost of printing their brief for use upon the argument of the demurrers; or, at all events, to so much of the cost of printing as was caused by their argument…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bond v. United RailroadsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  2. Nash v. RaunDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1946
  3. Bourazak v. North River InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API