Legal Opinion
Hulsey v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided May 4, 1976No. 52052PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Clark, Judge.
This case presents two novel issues: one is factual; the other is procedural.
The fact situation is unique in that one of two motorists injured in a collision of automobiles in a store parking lot sued only the owner of the realty on the basis that the proximate cause was the landowner’s negligence in designing and maintaining a parking area for its customers. Appellant’s approach is to analogize this situation to be one which should be resolved on the basis of products liability law.
The procedural item is presented by the appellee. It is urged that this court interpret the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hill v. WillisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1968
- Underwood v. Atlanta & West Point RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Higgins v. Cherokee RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
- Ludwig v. J. J. Newberry CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
- Flint Explosive Co. v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gunthorpe v. DanielsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- Thompson v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Bassham v. DiamondCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- In the Interest of D. R.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.