Legal Opinion
Mulqueen v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided May 8, 1933No. 172PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHASE, Circuit Judge.
The petitioner is the sole executrix of the will of Michael J. Mulqueen, who died October 12, 1924. He was her husband. He was an attorney at law practicing in the city of New York, and specialized in condemnation proceedings through which the city acquired property for public use. His business was conducted on a contingent basis, which made his fees dependent upon success and the amount a percentage of the award. When he died, some eases were unfinished.
A Mr. Lamb, who was a lawyer Mr. Mul-queen had had associated with him in his office, had a talk with Mrs. Mulqueen…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Burnet v. HoustonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Sargent v. . McLeodNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- Weagant v. BowersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
- United States v. Mahoning Coal RR Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931
- Badger v. CellerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Roe v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
- Sloane v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1951
- Sportwear Hosiery Mills v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- In Re WoodworthDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1936
- Peak v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.