Badger v. Celler
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Submission of a controversy upon an agreed statement of facts, pursuant to section 1279 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
1Opinion of the Court
Ingraham, J.:
The facts upon which this controversy arises, as stated in the agreed statement of facts, áre as follows : The defendant was the owner of certain premises in the pity of Hew York, and retained William W. Badger, an attorney and counselor at law, to prosecute an action for injunctive and other relief against the Manhattan Railway Company, operating an elevated railroad in front of the premises owned by th.e defendant herein. The said retainer was in writing, and by it the said William W. Badger was retained to collect all claims of the said Emelie Celler against the Manhattan…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Clark v. . GilbertNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
- Coe v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1853
- Wright v. . ShanahanNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
3Cited by10 opinions
- Roe v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
- Mulqueen v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- Roake v. PalmerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
- Spence v. BodeNew York Supreme Court · 1908
- In re the Estate of LatourelleNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.