Legal Opinion

Pangallo v. Pangallo

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 18, 1984No. 705PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROSKY, Judge:

In this appeal from a divorce decree appellant argues that the court erred in granting the divorce pursuant to Section 201(d)(1) of the Divorce Code 1 because, she contends, the parties had not lived separate and apart for three years. Mrs. Pangallo also contests the distribution of marital property ordered by the lower court. We affirm.

The parties were married in June, 1942. Since 1943 they have resided on farm property owned by them in Westmoreland County.

In 1979 Mr. Pangallo filed a divorce complaint under the former Pennsylvania Divorce Law. 2 After the enactment of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Remick v. RemickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Gee v. GeeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Lillis v. LillisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  4. Heckman v. HeckmanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1968

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Flynn v. FlynnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Campbell v. CampbellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Vajda v. VajdaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API