Ex Parte Nice
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
ON REHEARING
The application for rehearing by the State of Alabama is granted; the original opinions in these cases are withdrawn and the following opinion is substituted therefor:
Harold Pugh was found guilty of robbery by a jury in Jefferson County and was duly sentenced by the trial judge. Pugh timely filed a motion for a new trial, and the trial judge granted his motion.
The transcript of the proceedings held before the trial judge on Pugh's motion for a new trial contains the following statement by the trial judge of his reasons for granting Pugh's motion for a new trial:
It was based…
Also in this document: Per curiam 1; Per curiam 2.
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Greene v. MasseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Ex Parte JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- In Re Petition for Writ of ProhibitionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- State v. LewisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1992
- Ex Parte SpearsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- Griffin v. Unocal Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2008
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.