Legal Opinion

Young v. City of Tuscumbia

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 7, 1928No. 8 Div. 20PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The appellant sued the municipality on improvement ordinance, bonds under the authority of an act approved March 5, 1907, p. 295. Did amendatory Act of August 14, 1907, p. 645, apply? The bonds declared upon were issued in-1908; the initial ’improvement ordinance was adopted June 20, 1907, before the amendatory act was passed and the notice and permanent improvement ordinance and assessments were givfen, passed, and made by the municipality after the passage by the Legislature of the amendatory act. The demurrer challenged the right of recovery against the defendant city as a general…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lehman v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
  2. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  3. Town of Capitol Heights v. SteinerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  4. Henderson v. City of EnterpriseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  5. Steiner v. Town of Capitol HeightsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Opinions of the JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  2. State v. InmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API