Legal Opinion

Steiner v. Town of Capitol Heights

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 15, 1925No. 3 Div. 719PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.

This is a suit by L. Steiner against the town of Capitol Heights, a municipality. The plaintiff is the owner of certain sidewalk paving improvement bonds issued by defendant, which have matured, and the assessment made and collected in full toy defendant from the adjacent property improved was insufficient to pay in full the principal, evidenced by the bonds issued — part of which plaintiff owns. The defendant refused to pay the balance due on the bonds because there are no funds from the assessments against the property with which to pay it.

There are 9 counts in the complaint. Demurrers were…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Town of Capitol Heights v. SteinerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Oppenheim v. City of FlorenceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  2. Federal Deposit Ins. Corporation v. CasadyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
  3. In Re Opinions of the JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  4. Life & Casualty Ins. v. City of FloralaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
  5. Young v. City of TuscumbiaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API