Legal Opinion

People v. Barker

California Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1904No. Crim. No. 1149PublishedCited by 11 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.

The defendant was convicted of burglary and sentenced to imprisonment in the state prison. He appeals from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial. He asks for a reversal upon the grounds,—1. That the verdict is not supported by the evidence; and 2. That the court committed errors during the trial in ruling upon the admissibility of evidence.

1. The first ground is not tenable. The evidence presented some room for a plausible argument to the jury that it was not sufficient to warrant a verdict of guilty; but there was evidence tending to show defendant’s guilt…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. GoodrichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. King v. McCarthySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  3. Estate of AtwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. CarswellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Healy v. RennertNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
  3. People v. DunnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. People v. HanzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. People v. SandovalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API