Legal Opinion · Dissent

Montes v. City of Buffalo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 14, 2002Published

1DissentLawton, J.

I respectfully dissent in part because, in my view, Supreme Court properly denied the motion of defendants Kevin Helmer and Loretta Helmer for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint against them. I disagree with the majority that the Helmers established that the Code of City of Buffalo (Code) imposes liability upon abutting landowners for injuries resulting only from the failure to keep a sidewalk clear of snow and ice and not from the failure otherwise to maintain or repair a sidewalk. Section 413.50 (A) of the Code plainly states that “[t]he owner or occupant of lands fronting or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Meltzer v. KoenigsbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  2. Dumbarton Oaks Restaurant & Bar, Inc. v. New York State Liquor AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. City of New York v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API