Legal Opinion

Forster v. Ingram

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 31, 1918No. 9307PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from District Court. Muskogee County: Chas. G. Watts, Judge. Action by Emma T. Forster against Mary Ingram and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

GALBRAITH, C.

This was an action to establish a trust in real estate, the property involved being a town lot or a portion of a town lot in the city of Muskogee. There is no controversy as to the facts; the ease having been tried upon an agreed stipulation. The judgment of the trial court was for the defendants.

It appears from the stipulation that lot 3 in block 245, as shown by the original plat and survey of the city of Muskogee was scheduled to the plaintiff in error. Mary T. Forster; that said lot fronted on a street: that, after said lot had been appraised and two payments made…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. James v. Germania Iron Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
  2. Wallace v. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  3. Gonzales v. FrenchSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. Ross v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. Garrett v. WalcottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stevens v. PattenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Anderson v. Walker Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API