Hooker v. Farm Plan Corp.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Ray Thornton, Justice.
Appellant David Hooker appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of appellee Farm Plan Corporation (FPC). Acting pro se, he raises ten points for reversal. Because Hooker submitted a flagrantly deficient abstract, and his brief contained numerous other deficiencies, we affirm the trial court’s order under Ark. S. Ct. Rifle 4-2(a), (b).
After a careful reading of appellant’s brief, we are required to affirm the trial court’s ruling without reaching the merits of the case for the reasons listed. Our review of a case on appeal is limited to the record as…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Porter v. PorterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Kearney v. Committee on Professional ConductSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
- Finnegan v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Jewell v. Arkansas State Board of Dental ExaminersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
3Cited by14 opinions
- Lucas v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
- Massongill v. County of ScottSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
- K.M. v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Allison v. LongSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
- Middleton v. LockhartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.