Legal Opinion

People v. Keogh

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 8, 1975No. Crim. 24253PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

JEFFERSON, Acting P. J.

By information defendant Keogh was charged with burglary in violation of Penal Code section 459. He was then charged in a second information with four counts of forgery in violation of Penal Code section 470. The two informations were consolidated for trial, the burglary count as count I, and the four forgery counts as counts II, III, IV and V. The consolidated information was subsequently amended to add, as count VI, the crime of receiving stolen property in violation of Penal Code section 496.

Defendant entered a “not guilty” plea to all counts. His motion to…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Weems v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  4. In Re LynchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  5. People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. DillonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State of Iowa v. Denem Anthony NullSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  3. State v. HoustonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. People v. BaldwinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. People v. BencomoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API