State v. Johnson
Arizona Supreme Court
1DissentMartone, Justice
The court fails to distinguish between its frustration with a trial judge on the one hand, and its independent duty to evaluate the fairness of the defendant’s trial on the other. Its reversal will not otherwise deter the trial judge. Thus, an otherwise fair trial is scuttled without purpose.
Let us look at the fairness of the trial unclouded by the conduct of the trial judge. After the jury was sworn, the court gave a proper reasonable doubt instruction under Rule 18.6(c), Ariz.R.Crim.P. Neither side asked the trial judge to reinstruet the jury on reasonable doubt after the close of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. GendronArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. KinkadeArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. MarquezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- State v. JacksonArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991