Legal Opinion

State v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 25, 1991No. 1 CA-CR 90-029PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BROOKS, Presiding Judge.

Defendant Carl Dean Johnson appeals from the judgments of conviction and the sentences imposed after a jury found him guilty of one count of burglary in the first degree and two counts of aggravated assault. The sole issue raised is whether the trial court committed reversible error by failing to reinstruct the jury on reasonable doubt following closing arguments and by giving an instruction that improperly shifted the burden of proof. We find no reversible error and therefore affirm.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Defendant was charged by indictment with one count of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. WaltonArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. KinkadeArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. WhiteArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. MarquezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  5. State v. JacksonArizona Supreme Court · 1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonArizona Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. JohnsonArizona Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. JohnsonArizona Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API