Sebring Utilities Commission v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge:
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued several opinions and orders 1 in which it (1) found Florida Gas Transmission Company’s (FGT) gas curtailment plan to be unduly discriminatory and (2) disclaimed jurisdiction to order curtailment of gas FGT merely transports. In this case, several parties — 2 aligning themselves in different camps on different issues — seek review of those opinions. While some argue that substantial evidence does not support the Commission’s holdings, others insist that the Commission has erred in not immediately implementing its…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Port of Boston Marine Terminal Assn. v. Rederiaktiebolaget TransatlanticSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Federal Power Commission v. Louisiana Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Federal Power Commission v. Conway Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. Bankers Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- The Assigned Car CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- United Distribution Companies v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Windward Energy & Marketing Company, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Mississippi Valley Gas Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Office of Consumers' Counsel, State of Ohio v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Public Service Commission of the State of New York, Public Service Commission of West Virginia, Process Gas Consumers Group, Columbia Gas Distribution Companies, Ugi Corporation, Dayton Power and Light Company, Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation, Pennsylvania Gas and Water Company, Consumer Advocate for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Washington Gas Light Company, Interstate Natural Gas Association of America, Cities of Charlottesville and Richmond, Virginia, Consumer Advocate Division of the Public Service Commission of West Virginia, Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company, Baltimore Gas and Electric Company, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation, Transwestern Pipeline Company, Exxon Corporation, Maryland Office of People's Counsel, Intervenors. Associated Gas Distributors v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Public Service Commission of the State of New York, Public Service Commission of West Virginia, Pennsylvania Gas and Water Company, Process Gas Consumers Group, Columbia Gas Distribution Companies, Ugi Corporation, Dayton Power and Light Company, Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation, Washington Gas Light Company, Interstate Gas Association of America, Cities of Charlottesville and Richmond, Virginia, Consumer Advocate Division of the Public Service Commission of West Virginia, Office of Consumers' Counsel, Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company, Baltimore Gas and Electric Company, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation, Transwestern Pipeline Company, Exxon Corporation, Maryland Office of People's Counsel, Intervenors. Public Service Commission of the State of New York v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Washington Gas Light Company, Baltimore Gas and Electric Company, Exxon Corporation, Maryland Office of People's Counsel, Cities of Charlottesville and Richmond, Virginia, Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company, Office of Consumers' Counsel, Process Gas Consumers Group, Consumer Advocate Division of the Public Service Commission of West Virginia, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, Intervenors. Cities of Charlottesville and Richmond, Virginia v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Dayton Power and Light Company, Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company, Maryland Office of People's Counsel, Baltimore Gas and Electric Company, Process Gas Consumers Group, Washington Gas Light Company, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, Intervenors. Citizen/labor Energy Coalition v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Dayton Power and Light Company, Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company, Baltimore Gas and Electric Company, Maryland Office of People's Counsel, Consumers' Counsel, State of Ohio, Process Gas Consumers Group, Washington Gas Light Company, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, Intervenors. Baltimore Gas & Electric Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Dayton Power and Light Company, Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company, Office of Consumers' Counsel, Maryland Office of People's Counsel, Process Gas Consumers Group, Washington Gas Light Company, Cities of Charlottesville and Richmond, Virginia, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, Intervenors. Process Gas Consumers Group v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, Office of Consumers' Counsel, Baltimore Gas and Electric Company, Cities of Charlottesville and Richmond, Virginia, Washington Gas Light Company, Maryland Office of People's Counsel, Pennsylvania Department of Commerce, Association of Businesses Advocating Tariff Equity, American Iron and Steel Institute, Georgia Industrial Group, Intervenors. Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Ugi Corporation, Dayton Power and Light Company, Public Service Commission of West Virginia, Process Gas Consumers Group, Public Service Commission of the State of New York, Pennsylvania Gas and Water Company, Columbia Gas Distribution Companies, Ohio Office of Consumers' Counsel, Washington Gas Light Company, Associated Gas Distributors, Baltimore Gas and Electric Company, Cities of Charlottesville and Richmond, Virginia, Interstate Natural Gas Association of America, Transwestern Pipeline Company, Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation, Maryland Office of People's Counsel, the Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company and Union Light, Heat & Power Company, Consumer Advocate Division of the Public Service Commission of West Virginia, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- The Public Service Commission of the State of New York v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Commonwealth Gas Pipeline Corp., Carolina Pipeline Corporation, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation, Intervenors. North Carolina Natural Gas Corporation, Public Service Company of North Carolina, Inc., Piedmont Natural Gas Company, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Carolina Pipeline Company, Commonwealth Gas Pipeline Corporation, Public Service Commission of the State of New York, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp., Brooklyn Union Gas Co., Columbia Gas Transmission Corp., Washington Gas Light Company, Atlanta Gas Light Company, Intervenors. North Carolina Utilities Commission v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Carolina Pipeline Company, Commonwealth Gas Pipeline Corporation, Public Service Commission of the State of New York, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp., Brooklyn Union Gas Co., Columbia Gas Transmission Corp., Washington Gas Light Company, Atlanta Gas Light Company, North Carolina Natural Gas Corp., Intervenors. Long Island Lighting Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp., North Carolina Natural Gas Corp., North Carolina Utilities Commission, Carolina Pipeline Company, Commonwealthgas Pipeline Corporation, Public Service Commission of the State of New York, Brooklyn Union Gas Company, Washington Gas Light Company, Atlanta Gas Light Company, Intervenors. The Brooklyn Union Gas Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp., Public Service Commission of the State of New York, Commonwealth Gas Pipeline Corporation, North Carolina Natural Gas Corp., North Carolina Utilities Commission, Washington Gas Light Company, Atlanta Gas Light Company, Intervenors. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Carolina Pipeline Company, North Carolina Natural Gas Corp., Brooklyn Union Gas Company, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- City of Farmington, New Mexico v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Amoco Production Company, Amoco Gas Company, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.