Legal Opinion · Dissent

Connecticut National Bank v. L & R Realty

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 26, 1997No. AC 16092Published

1DissentLavery, J.

I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion as to the trial court’s striking of L & R Realty’s claim for a jury trial. I agree with the trial court that by signing the note, mortgage deed and guarantee, with the jury waiver clause, the defendants waived all claims to a trial by jury and that the action is in equity. There are two issues: (1) whether the jury waiver clauses located in the loan documents should be enforced and (2) whether the trial court was correct in its ruling that the action was essentially equitable.

I

The defendants admit in their pleadings, i.e., answer, special…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. D. H. Overmyer Co., Inc. of Ohio v. Frick Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. K.M.C. Co., Inc. v. Irving Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  3. Hartford Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. TuckerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  4. Chase Commercial Corp. v. OwenMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
  5. Krupa v. Farmington River Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1959

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API