Legal Opinion
Supreme Foodservice Gmbh v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided September 18, 2013No. 13-245CPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Post-Award protest; Responsibility evaluation; Discussions; and Responsiveness; Equality of evaluations.
OPINION
Merow, Senior Judge.
In this post-award bid protest case, Supreme Foodservice GmbH (“Supreme” or “plaintiff”), an unsuccessful offeror, challenges the decision of the Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support (“DLA” or the “Agency”) to award a Subsistence Prime Vendor-Afghanistan (“SPV”) contract to ANHAM FZCO (“Anham” or “defendant-intervenor” 2 ) under Solicitation No. SPM300-11-R-0063 (“Solicitation” or “Request for Proposal” or “RFP”).
Before the court are: (1) Supreme’s Motion for…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Eco Tour Adventures, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Cyios Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Algese 2 S.C.A.R.L. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Alaska Structures, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.