Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Bannum, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided December 5, 2014No. 14-822CPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bid Protest; Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record; Best Value.

OPINION

HORN, J.

On September 5, 2014, protestor, Bannum, Inc. (Bannum), filed a post-award bid protest in this court challenging the United States Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons’ (BOP’s) award of a contract for the provision of Residential Re-Entry Center (RRC) Services in Fayetteville, North Carolina to The Alston Wilkes Society (AWS) under Request for Proposals 200-1162-MA (the RFP or solicitation). AWS intervened in the protest. Protestor alleges that AWS did not provide proof of zoning within the…

2Cases cited128 opinions

  1. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975

123 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Innovative Test Asset Solutions LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  2. Alaska Structures, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
  3. Netcentrics Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
  4. The Severson Group, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API