Legal Opinion
Ketchikan Spruce Mills v. Alaska Concrete Products Co.
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided August 18, 1953No. Nos. 3321-KA, 3320-KAPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOLTA, District Judge.
The foregoing suits were consolidated for argument of plaintiff’s application for a preliminary injunction.
Plaintiff operates a large sawmill in the City of Ketchikan and lumber yards and sales offices in other places in the Territory; and stores, sells and ships lumber and other products by water to its lumber yards and to consumers in the Territory and elsewhere. It also operates vessels and barges. Since the mill cannot be expanded because it is hemmed in by the business district of Ketchikan and the waters of Tongass Narrows, plaintiff bought, at a cost of $30,000 a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Tiffany v. . Town of Oyster BayNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Worthen Lumber Mills v. Alaska Juneau Gold Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1916
- Alaska Juneau Gold Mining Co. v. Northern Lumber MillsDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1915
3Cited by3 opinions
- State, Department of Natural Resources v. Alaska Riverways, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2010
- Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes v. NamenDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1974
- McCavit v. LacherAlaska Supreme Court · 2019