Legal Opinion

Behymer v. Milgram Food Stores, Inc.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 4, 1940No. 34,711PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Thiele, J.:

This was an action for damages. The trial court sustained defendant’s motion for judgment non obstante veredicto and plaintiff appeals.

In her petition plaintiff alleged that she entered defendant’s place of business carrying a shopping bag containing articles purchased elsewhere, and when she started to leave an employee of defendant assaulted her, grabbed her shopping bag and scattered its contents on the floor, but finding nothing which had been taken from the defendant’s store, ordered plaintiff out of the store; that the employee who…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. LawsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  2. Witt ex rel. Witt v. RoperSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  3. Adams v. City of SalinaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897
  4. Shore v. ShoreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  5. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis Railroad v. LittleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cynthia Keehr and Bruce Keehr v. Consolidated Freightways of Delaware, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  2. Mid-America Food Service, Inc. v. Ara Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
  3. Hutchinson Human Relations Commission v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  4. Estell v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1948
  5. Lewis v. Victory Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API