Eddleman v. McGhan
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtOlson, J.
When an alleged stipulation or agreement of compromise does not comply with the pertinent rule or statute because it is not in writing and subscribed by the attorney denying it, can conflicting evidence of its consummation be considered, to sustain an offset pleaded in an action other than the cause in which the stipulation allegedly was made?
The trial court disregarded such evidence, denied defendants’ offset, and entered judgment for plaintiff. Defendants have appealed.
Defendant C. D. McGhan drew a check to the order of Skycoach Airlines Agency to pay a debt he owed the agency. The check…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hendricks v. HendricksWashington Supreme Court · 1949
- Muscek v. Equitable Savings & Loan Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1946
3Cited by12 opinions
- Condon v. CondonWashington Supreme Court · 2013
- In Re the Marriage of Ferree & FerreeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
- In re the Marriage of CoyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- Lavigne v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- Metronet Services Corporation Metronet Telemanagement Corporation v. Us West CommunicationsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.