Legal Opinion

Helmerich & Payne International Drilling Co. v. BOPCO, L.P.

Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)

Decided December 1, 2011No. 11-10-00232-CVPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TERRY McCALL, Justice.

This case involves the interpretation of a daywork drilling contract. The parties disagree as to the date that the 1,095-day term of the contract commenced. Upon construing the contract, the trial court rendered summary judgment granting declaratory relief to appellee, BOPCO, L.P. 1 The trial court declared, among other things, that the 1,095-day contract term commenced on March 20, 2007. Appellant, Helmerich & Payne International Drilling Co. (H & P), appeals from the trial court’s summary judgment. We affirm.

Background Facts

In late 2005, BOPCO needed a drilling…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Valence Operating Co. v. DorsettTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Seagull Energy E & P, Inc. v. Eland Energy, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Haworth v. JantzenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  4. Southern Corrections Systems Inc. v. Union City Public SchoolsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  5. Hopkins v. Farmers' Nat. Bank of NormanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Huff Energy Fund, L.P. v. Longview Energy Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2015
  2. Woolslayer Companies, Inc. v. WoolslayerDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2019
  3. the Huff Energy Fund, L.P., WRH Energy Partners, L.L.C., William R."Bill" Huff, Rick D'Angelo, Ed Dartley, Bryan Bloom, and Riley-Huff Energy Group, LLC v. Longview Energy Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API