Helmerich & Payne International Drilling Co. v. BOPCO, L.P.
Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TERRY McCALL, Justice.
This case involves the interpretation of a daywork drilling contract. The parties disagree as to the date that the 1,095-day term of the contract commenced. Upon construing the contract, the trial court rendered summary judgment granting declaratory relief to appellee, BOPCO, L.P. 1 The trial court declared, among other things, that the 1,095-day contract term commenced on March 20, 2007. Appellant, Helmerich & Payne International Drilling Co. (H & P), appeals from the trial court’s summary judgment. We affirm.
Background Facts
In late 2005, BOPCO needed a drilling…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Valence Operating Co. v. DorsettTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- Seagull Energy E & P, Inc. v. Eland Energy, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2006
- Haworth v. JantzenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- Southern Corrections Systems Inc. v. Union City Public SchoolsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Hopkins v. Farmers' Nat. Bank of NormanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Huff Energy Fund, L.P. v. Longview Energy Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2015
- Woolslayer Companies, Inc. v. WoolslayerDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2019
- the Huff Energy Fund, L.P., WRH Energy Partners, L.L.C., William R."Bill" Huff, Rick D'Angelo, Ed Dartley, Bryan Bloom, and Riley-Huff Energy Group, LLC v. Longview Energy Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2015