Commonwealth v. Terebieniec
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge:
Appellant contends that: 1) the evidence was insufficient to prove that he did not withdraw from the alleged conspiracy; 2) his arraignment on closed circuit television violated his constitutional rights to a fair arraignment and a fair trial; 3) amendment of the indictment against him to include the name of a coconspirator was improper and prejudicial; 4) the suppression court erred in failing to suppress an inculpatory statement allegedly the product of unnecessary delay between arrest and arraignment; and 5) the suppression court erred in failing to suppress the statement…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Sheppard v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Davis v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. PhillipsOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Commonwealth v. StanleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- David Valenzuela-Gonzalez v. United States District Court for the District of Arizona, United States of America, Real Party in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- State v. PhillipsOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. LindseyIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.