Legal Opinion

Ulrich v. Senior & Disabled Services Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 24, 1996No. 4-0312-AZ0603; CA A86249Published

1Opinion of the Court

921 P.2d 982 (1996)

142 Or. App. 290

Dawn C. ULRICH, Petitioner,

v.

SENIOR AND DISABLED SERVICES DIVISION, Respondent.

4-0312-AZ0603; CA A86249.

Court of Appeals of Oregon, In Banc.[*]

Argued and Submitted February 29, 1996.

Resubmitted June 12, 1996.

Decided July 24, 1996.

Megan E. Glor, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the brief was Swanson, Thomas & Coon.

Erika L. Hadlock, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

Resubmitted In Banc June 12, 1996.

HASELTON, Judge.

Petitione…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Don't Waste Oregon Committee v. Energy Facility Siting CouncilOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Ulrich v. Senior & Disabled Services DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API