Legal Opinion

Carlson v. Milbrad

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1966No. 37813PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinley, J.

The plaintiff-respondents, Marion Carlson and his wife, Wilma, sold to the defendant-appellants, Fred Milbrad and his wife, Mildred, the business known as the “Eastlake Zesto Drive-In,” on April 23, 1962. The legal means utilized to effectuate the sale were a conditional sale contract and an assignment of the lease for the realty on which the business is situated. After the Milbrads had operated the business for approximately 4 months, they resold to the defendants, Frank Bell and his wife, Joyce. The Bells assumed the balance due to the Carlsons under the previously mentioned conditional…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Preston v. DuncanWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Miller v. Payless Drug Stores of Washington, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Lambert v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Stringfellow v. StringfellowWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Messina v. Rhodes Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Meadows v. Grant's Auto Brokers, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Melby v. Hawkins Pontiac, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  3. Bankhead v. City of TacomaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
  4. Dana Brown v. ProTech Auto, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API