Legal Opinion
United States v. Salah Dado
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided July 10, 2014No. 13-1578PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtClay, J., joined by Moore, J.,
MERRITT, J. (pp. 571-73), delivered a separate dissenting opinion.
OPINION
CLAY, Circuit Judge.
Defendant Salah Dado appeals his convictions and 20-year mandatory minimum sentence for conspiracy to manufacture, distribute, or possess 1,000 or more marijuana plants with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846; and aiding and abetting the manufacture of 1,000 or more marijuana plants, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and (b)(l)(A)(vii). For the reasons set forth below, we reject Defendant’s arguments for reversal, and AFFIRM Defendant’s convictions and sentence.
BACKGROUND
On…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- United States v. AkbarCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2015
- United States v. Manuel SotoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Sarah CalvettiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Jabree WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- State v. DavilaWashington Supreme Court · 2015
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.