Legal Opinion · Dissent

Heagerty v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 21, 1998No. 98-848Published

1DissentDavid Newbern, Justice

In order to retain jurisdiction over charges brought against a juvenile defendant, a circuit court must find “by clear and convincing evidence,” based upon the three factors set forth in Ark. Code Ann. § 9-27-318(e) (Repl. 1998), that the “juvenile should be tried as an adult.” Ark. Code Ann. § 9-27-318(f) (Repl. 1998). Such a finding must be reversed if it is clearly erroneous. Sanford v. State, 331 Ark. 334, 348, 962 S.W.2d 335, 342 (1998). A trial court’s finding “is clearly erroneous when, although there is evidence to support it, the appellate court after reviewing the entire evidence is…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Sanford v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Noland v. NolandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  3. McClure v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  4. Cole v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  5. Hogan v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API