Legal Opinion
Electronic Laboratory Supply Co. v. Motorola, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 11, 1992No. Civ. A. 88-4494PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HUTTON, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is the plaintiffs’ motion for reconsideration, the defendants’ response and the plaintiffs’ reply. The relevant facts are discussed in this Court’s Memoranda dated July 3, 1990 and December 30, 1991. 782 F.Supp. 1016. The plaintiffs ask the Court to reconsider the Court’s grant of summary judgment to the defendants on the ground that the Court failed to consider the potential aider/abettor liability of the defendants. For the following reasons, the plaintiffs’ motion is DENIED.
The United States Court of Appeals for the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Inc. v. Hydrolevel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Union Bank v. WolasSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Jon A. CAMP, Appellant, v. Robert J. DEMA, James R. Millwee, Alexander Mitchell, and James Kidder, AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- Electronic Lab Supply Co. v. CullenDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
3Cited by1 opinion
- Electronic Laboratory Supply Company, Inc. And Jack Snyderman v. Raymond T. Cullen, Ronald B. Hauben, and Joseph WolfsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992