Legal Opinion
Electronic Laboratory Supply Company, Inc. And Jack Snyderman v. Raymond T. Cullen, Ronald B. Hauben, and Joseph Wolfson
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided October 15, 1992No. 92-1145PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
COWEN, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-appellants Electronic Laboratory Supply Co. (“ELSCO”) and Jack Snyder-man appeal the grant of summary judgment dismissing their claims under section 34(d)(ll) of the Lanham Trademark Act, codified as amended at 15 U.S.C. § 1116(d)(ll) (1988). The defendant-appel-lees are three attorneys who allegedly obtained a wrongful ex parte seizure of appellants’ goods. At issue in this appeal is (1) whether an attorney can be a defendant under section 1116(d)(ll), which provides a cause of action for wrongful seizure against the “applicant” for an ex…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. BonjornoSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Pinter v. DahlSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Landy v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Landry v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Central Bank of Denver, N. A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- American Telephone And Telegraph Company v. Winback And Conserve Program, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Leonard A. PelulloCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Balance Dynamics Corporation v. Schmitt Industries, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Government of the Virgin Islands v. Henry D. KnightCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.