Legal Opinion

Goldberger v. City of Perth Amboy

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 14, 1938PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Barbour, S. C. C.

This matter comes before me as Supreme Court commissioner on motion to strike amended answer and counter-claim and on stipulation of fact.

The plaintiff sues to recover money alleged to be due him on his salary while serving as judge of the District Court of the city of Perth Amboy, from January 19th, 1931, to July 1st, 1936, alleging that the defendant illegally deducted certain sums from the salary due him and has refused to pay the same.

It is admitted that on January 19th, 1931, the plaintiff was duly appointed and commissioned by the governor, by and with the advice and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wilson v. McGuinnessSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1910
  2. Hayes v. Mayor & Council of City of HobokenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1919
  3. Delmar v. County of BergenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Keenan v. Bd. of Chosen FreeholdersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
  2. Warren v. County of HudsonHudson County Superior Court · 1945
  3. Harper v. City of AtlanticSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API