United States Ex Rel. Mariano v. Tsosie
District Court, D. New Mexico
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HANSEN, District Judge.
The issue before me in this matter is whether or not I should abstain sua sponte. All three parties oppose abstention. Having reviewed the record, briefs of the parties requested by the Court on this specific issue, and applicable case law, I conclude that I must consider the Indian abstention doctrine sua sponte and that, having done so, abstention and comity principles, as applied to the facts of this case, require me to abstain. Accordingly, I dismiss this federal court action without prejudice.
I. Historical and Procedural Background
This is a civil…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- National Farmers Union Insurance v. Crow Tribe of IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Iowa Mutual Insurance v. LaPlanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Sac & Fox NationSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. TsosieCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. TSOSIECourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Kerr-McGee Corp. v. FarleyDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1995
- Bank One, N.A. v. LewisDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2001