Legal Opinion

United States Ex Rel. Mariano v. Tsosie

District Court, D. New Mexico

Decided April 21, 1994No. CIV 92-1234 LH/DJSPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

HANSEN, District Judge.

The issue before me in this matter is whether or not I should abstain sua sponte. All three parties oppose abstention. Having reviewed the record, briefs of the parties requested by the Court on this specific issue, and applicable case law, I conclude that I must consider the Indian abstention doctrine sua sponte and that, having done so, abstention and comity principles, as applied to the facts of this case, require me to abstain. Accordingly, I dismiss this federal court action without prejudice.

I. Historical and Procedural Background

This is a civil…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. National Farmers Union Insurance v. Crow Tribe of IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Iowa Mutual Insurance v. LaPlanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Sac & Fox NationSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. TsosieCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  2. United States v. TSOSIECourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  3. Kerr-McGee Corp. v. FarleyDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1995
  4. Bank One, N.A. v. LewisDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API