Legal Opinion
William Scully and Jane A. Scully v. United States of America, Clifton H. Meisinger and Ophelia Meisinger
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 29, 1969No. 10144PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Circuit Judge.
In order to construct the Marion Dam and Reservoir the United States filed a declaration of taking under authority of 40 U.S.C. § 258a to condemn an area of land located within the District of Kansas. Included within the designated acreage was a 320-acre farm owned in fee by appellant Scully and leased to appellee Meisinger. Pursuant to Rule 71A (h), F.R.Civ.P., the district judge constituted a commission to determine the just compensation to be paid for the property. The commission conducted hearings, determined the sum to be awarded, and apportioned the total between the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. CausbySupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States Ex Rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. PowelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. Petty Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. DowSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. SowardsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- San Diego Metropolitan Transit Development Board v. Handlery Hotel, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. GrayNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
- United States v. Francis W. Brinker and Julia T. Brinker, Carlos F. Bingesser and Marjorie L. BingesserCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
- United States v. 27,223.21 Acres of LandDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1984
- United States v. 8.0 Acres of LandCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.