Ben Lomond Wine Co. v. Sladky
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from Superior Court, Santa Cruz County; Lucas F. Smith, Judge. Action by the Ben Lomond Wine Company against Charles Sladky. Judgment for defendant, and from an order granting a new trial defendant appeals.
1Per curiam
This action was tried before a jury, and a verdict rendered in favor of the defendant. A motion for a new trial was granted, from which the present appeal has been taken.
One of the grounds for the motion was the insufficiency of the evidence to justify the verdict, and the order granting a new trial, being general in its terms, must, under the well-established rule, be affirmed.
The contention of the appellant that because the court, at the time it made the order, filed an opinion setting forth certain reasons for its action, the consideration of the appeal is limited to those reasons, is…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Newman v. Overland Pacific Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
- Churchill v. FlournoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Bledsoe v. DecrowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Standard Quicksilver Co. v. HabishawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
3Cited by1 opinion
- Schnittger v. RoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903