Legal Opinion

Blanchard v. Haber

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 28, 1927No. 28462PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’NIELL, O. J.

This is a proceeding by injunction to compel the defendant to obey the obligation assumed in the last paragraph of the following agreement had with the plaintiff, dated the 26th of September, 1925, viz.:

“Memorandum of Agreement.
“This agreement, made and entered into between F. A. Blanchard, party of the first part, and Dr. M. F. Haber, party of the second part, witnesseth:
“Whereas, the party of the first part desires the services of a dentist; and
“Whereas, the party of the secbnd part, a dentist, desires to continue in the employ of the party of the first part:
“Now, therefore,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rakestraw v. LanierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  2. Murray v. BarnhartSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
  3. Tarr v. StearmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Freudenthal v. EspeySupreme Court of Colorado · 1909

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Blanchard v. HaberSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
  2. State Ex Rel. Szodomka v. GruberSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
  3. Hirsch v. RosenbergLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Tennant v. RussellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1946
  5. Johnson v. ChampagneSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API