Legal Opinion

Ridgely National Bank v. Patton & Hamilton

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1884PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the Third District;— heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Sangamon county; the Hon. C. S. Zane, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Sheldon

This was an action brought by Patton & Hamilton, against the Ridgely National Bank, to recover the amount of the following check:

“The Ridgely National Bank, Springfield, Rlinois:
“Pay to Patton & Hamilton, for account of Lewis Coleman & Co., or order, ten hundred eighteen T2^ dollars.

$1018^0- Kimber, Ragsdale & Co.”

Upon trial in the circuit court, without a jury, judgment was rendered for the plaintiffs for the full amount of the check, which,- on appeal to the Appellate Court for the Third District, was affirmed, and the defendant appealed to this court.

The facts appearing are, that Patton &…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bickford v. First National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Thomas R. Wood & Co. v. Merchants' Saving, Loan & Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1866

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Merchants & Planters Bank v. MeyerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1892
  2. First National Bank v. LightnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  3. Grissom v. Commerial National BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Brown v. Cow Creek Sheep Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Industrial Bank v. BowesIllinois Supreme Court · 1897

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API