Legal Opinion
Glazer v. Lamkin
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided September 7, 1993No. Docket 140624PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShepherd, J.
In this defamation action, the trial court granted defendant’s motion for summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116(0(10). Plaintiffs now appeal, and we affirm.
Plaintiffs’ complaint sets forth the following allegations:
3. That on or about December 19, 1989, at a meeting called by the Hamburg Township Board Defendant did accuse the Plaintiffs of paying off certain elected Board officials in order to obtain political favors in the form of a favorable vote on a zoning request that had been made by the plaintiffs.
4. That at the same meeting the Defendant did accuse the Plaintiffs of having undue…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lorencz v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1992
- In Re Forfeiture of $5,264Michigan Supreme Court · 1989
- Rouch v. Enquirer & News of Battle CreekMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
- Michigan Millers Mutual Insurance v. West Detroit Building Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1992
- People v. HawkinsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Lane v. Kindercare Learning Centers, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
- Hilgendorf v. St. John Hosp. and Medical Center Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2001
- Wickings v. Arctic Enterprises, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
- Burden v. Elias Bros. Big Boy RestaurantsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
- Chastain v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2003
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.