Legal Opinion

King v. County of Mendocino

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 25, 1962No. Civ. No. 20255Published

1Opinion of the CourtDraper, P. J.

This is a personal injury action against a county. The court instructed the jury only on negligence and refused instructions on the Public Liability Act (Gov. Code, § 53051). Verdict and judgment were for defendant, and plaintiff appeals, The principal issue is whether refusal to instruct on the Public Liability Act constitutes error prejudicial to plaintiff.

Plaintiff drove to his place of employment over a county road. On return trips, he traversed a down grade, at the top of which was a sign “Steep Grade, Úse Low Gear,” and which was also posted with a number of “Slow, Curve” signs. On the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Muskopf v. Corning Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Kotronakis v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  3. Pritchard v. Sully-Miller Contracting Co.California Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Akers v. City of Palo AltoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. Ngim v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API