State ex rel. Wilson v. Jameson
Court of Appeals of Maryland
ÁBspeae from Charles Comfy Court. The present was an action of Debt, instituted ór¡ tlie: oth August; 1825, in the name of the State of Mdryláhd, tfib instance, and for the use of William M.' B: Wilson,' ahd Sarah Q. his wife, against the appellee, Luke F. Jameson, on his bond, as administrator of Walter Jameson, deceased, to recover the distributive share, of the said Sarah Q. as one of the children and representatives of the said Walter, of whom there were nine. 1. At the…
Read the full summary
ÁBspeae from Charles Comfy Court. The present was an action of Debt, instituted ór¡ tlie: oth August; 1825, in the name of the State of Mdryláhd, tfib instance, and for the use of William M.' B: Wilson,' ahd Sarah Q. his wife, against the appellee, Luke F. Jameson, on his bond, as administrator of Walter Jameson, deceased, to recover the distributive share, of the said Sarah Q. as one of the children and representatives of the said Walter, of whom there were nine. 1. At the trial it was admitted that the plaintiff, Sarah Q. and the defendant, are each representatives of the’deceased Walter…
1Opinion of the CourtEarle, J.
the court. ''
The court’s opinion, excepted to. in this appeal j manifestly relates to a state of pleadings, and issue joined ¿between the., *447parties, that do not appear in the record. The counsel in the cause admit the defect, and to save the expense and delay of a suggested diminution, have agreed, that we shall review the opinion below, as expressed in the bill of exceptions, upon the point, whether or not the deeds and evidence constitute an advancement in law, so as to preclude a recovery by the plaintiffs, of a distributive share of the estate of Walter Jameson, the father, without…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Hayden v. BurchCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1850
- In re the Estate of YoungHigh Court of Chancery of Maryland · 1851