Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Young

High Court of Chancery of Maryland

Decided December 15, 1851PublishedCited by 2 opinions

[The real estate of Motley Young, deceased, who died intestate, was sold under the proceedings in this case, in aid of his personalty, for the purpose of paying his debts, and distribution amongst his heirs-at-law. Several questions arose in the progress of the cause, upon which the Chancellor delivered opinions.

Read the full summary

[The real estate of Motley Young, deceased, who died intestate, was sold under the proceedings in this case, in aid of his personalty, for the purpose of paying his debts, and distribution amongst his heirs-at-law. Several questions arose in the progress of the cause, upon which the Chancellor delivered opinions. The first question was upon two petitions of Clement Young and Julia F. Young, infant defendants and heirs-at-law of the deceased, by William A. Brady, their guardian ad litem and next friend, filed on the 14th of February, and 25th of March, 1851. One of these petitions alleges that…

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor:

This ease was submitted during the sittings of the term, upon the petitions of Clement Young and Julia F. Young, infant defendants, by their guardian, William A. Brady, and now, at the close of the sittings, is laid before the Court in conformity with the rule.

The petitions, which were filed on the 14th of February and the 25th of March, 1851, allege that Notley Young, the intestate, and the father of the petitioners, in his lifetime convoyed gratuitously, as an advancement to his daughters, Martha Young and Heloise Smith, certain parcels of his real and personal estate, which…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cole v. AlbersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1843
  2. Henck v. TodhunterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1826
  3. Harris v. AlcockCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1838
  4. Burch v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1829
  5. Diffenderffer v. WinderCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1831

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Switkes v. John McShain, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1953
  2. Mobley v. MobleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API